nationalists for the same reason of being born quarries in the army must make a brief account of what it meant to APRA for "Militarism in Peru [1] never to fall into the same" mistakes "if you can call that how to knit alliance between them and the Aprismo. History Civil Leguia dictatorship, which dissolved the Congress calling for a National Assembly to give a new constitution that was to their services. Assembly recognized the electoral victory of Leguia and gave him the title of President of the Constitution, must show the character of a constituent. When he turned tyrant, the role of the army in its 11 years, was to maintain the regime and hold it against the opinion and will take into account popular.Hay lords also nationalists, the first tacit agreement between APRA and the oligarchic class, precursor of the other to be held later in history, one in which the Constituent Congress coincided with APRA to extol the Presidency to an Oscar R. Military Benavides, even though the constitution that was enacted just days before prohibiting it in its Article 137 that can be elected president "to members of the Armed Forces who are in service." But what matters, as matters now, violate a constitutional provision? At the end of the APRA fulfilled its commitment to physically eliminate Sánchez Cerro and Benavides with yours to release the Leader of the Alianza Popular Revolucionaria Americana. Benavides did not comply with what was covered call elections for the parliamentary election and not on call to cover the 23 additional vacancies left by APRA representatives spree Sánchez Cerro, who had offered verbally elections Haya de la Torres [2] . Naturally, the APRA letter went on to play "alternative" and then go underground opposition, so their members displaying their bravery and courage, and their leaders proclaimed "Social Justice", however, the battle raged more against dictatorship for obtaining benefits conquests in Pueblo. While APRA militants and supporters fought and died for their ideas, party leaders were conspicuous by their absence, and the Chief, Haya de la Torre, was effectively protected in the house of the cousin and brother of the dictator, Augusto Benavides Canseco. This possible contradiction was only apparent. In the background the mutinies had no official support of the Party-Like today said: "Alan else rules to the right that the PAP" - with the only difference that now the PAP leadership is no longer a mass discontent but rather is a dome encapsulated in power, with greater opportunities to betray the top and no longer as simple past when demagogues who proclaimed "Revolution" launched a frenzied mass slaughter, and then when the big decisions, evading responsibility and carry out ADMINISTRATION their own members "not to compromise the party." There was nothing strange that a conspiracy existed. Haya de la Torre juice always double game of cards, a "political" as he said and others of a conspiracy. Similar thing happened when he was elected Bustamante y Rivero in 1945 with the difference that this time the political game was made in the open, however, in 1939 the political cards are played in a clandestine manner probably by the blush that still had the APRA leaders. However, it is also possible that the alleged conspiracy lacked the necessary seriousness, it was only a cover to sectors APRA true revolutionary party submissive attitude. This approach has also been pleasing to Hague, it happened in 1948 when he encouraged a revolution which, however, the sabotaged and betrayed to succeed n the "Letters Policy." Reality has been reversed for these times, APRA will no longer is the one who plays the card supports and conspiracy as an alternative, for now, has enough power to avoid the need to play that card and this should be taken very clear because a real Marxist is not allowed to walk on sentences bombastic set out as a great need, we must look at all the specific features of each historical moment but always directly related to the spiral development of the facts so as not to evade history. We will be faithful to this requirement, arguably mandatory from the standpoint of scientific foundation of the policy. Since no place in the foreground the systematic and relentless exposure of the constitutionalist illusions, without laying bare their roots and not just to restore a political perspective, it is impossible to completely take a single step approach on tactical tasks in Peru días.Los our knowledge and outlined how the policy handles APRA party in history are clear, the only difference that now power, are allies RIGHT and operate under the rules fujimontesinistas and with the support of his team dictatorial. Policy that is based on two letters "politics" and the conspiracy, that is, one agrees and the other prepares the boycott. And this the national to the same style of our entire republican policy full of mistakes in tactics raised-called fall into the "fails" and say: Yes to APPEASEMENT, the UNIT in an amorphous mass with the APRA. To cede the post to legitimize, as the leader himself admitted in an interview to the newspaper "Our Flag" [3] 2007.La February convening the Constituent Assembly was Now for Alan García promised and cried profusely in all Peruvian newspapers without exception: "It is necessary to call Assembly to add to the Death Penalty point for this and others." APRA is the government has acknowledged that its main task is to lead the country to the Constituent Assembly, and that this is useless and impotent (as they seek real solutions to the ills of Peru, has nothing to do with Constituent Assembly, or general election, or any other event since the State election typed), Ollanta Humala, who wants to lead the lefts and the fate of national policy in general: "It is impossible to have a constitution to Form APRA -While "... there is no guarantee. In the end, this constitution that the current neoliberal but will have to implode for the same social reality of the country that will not take "very clear thought: you can not, but if you can and will and the country will not support, these are the demagoguery to which we are so used our "possible representatives" a heap of nonsense phrases that are the everyday ways to divert the masses from their release. Since the path of the people rests fundamentally on the political organization of the oppressed (his party), and determined struggle to develop to settle once and for all the injustice, hunger, poverty, and corruption. This struggle is against the state and the prevailing system. It is against the bourgeoisie and landlords. This struggle to be true, you need to target the groups in power, imperialism, and their political lackeys of the left and right. That's why it should be defined once, that the proposals should be within the context and framework of a direct link to the story, we can let you know clearly that the transition to a popular government, and literally puts the word DEMOCRACY broken down into its roots, going to forget the "I BELIEVE" that we face Ollanta on the Constitutional history of which "Republican" gives us clear indication of what I mean at this its more than 185 years of government and the real contribution they have given to the specific problem of the Peruvian population. In that sense we should define what is unity in order to give a real tactical twist that can take us to victory. Since this being a cause that is derived directly from a platform or program, even if "Not all are worth working for progress, to hold otherwise would mean that all games are revolutionary. There are dialectical jumps but there are also backward or vacuum and we are not involutive setbacks. A poorly formulated a policy designed program but [4] leads the mistake and then to defeat. "Unit being well, you should turn around the situation, social unrest, which can create widespread they need a degree of political organization and awareness, allowing us to establish a structure to educate and mobilize the masses in transforming activity, it is not plated as: "Everything revolves around a constitution." The economic problem is the root cause of the crisis of society and that includes others, such as lack of opportunities, marginalization, no development of the quality of life, not solved or will be addressed in a more , The structure that arises around the Constituent to the awareness training in the "benefits" of it, is a structure without a foundation, moreover, is not a call to build an opposition bloc, it is only an agreement to become workers in their position, contract to expire when the APRA see its claims of repression and genocide against the "terrorists" into the paper such as the current Mayor of Parcoy-social activist punished with 10 years in prison for fighting a mining company "Nuevo Horizonte SA" polluter its community and trampled the dignity of a people-"terrorist" since then. We were not even raised a drive based on a platform protest in the best case, you can gather the true affected by neoliberal policies, none of that to what we are called is to shape the State agent Revolutionary Bourgeois, encouraging one of its measures to assembly without considering this military court is composed of the people who have to assume the defense of the bourgeois state by the "errors" of the leaders who incite war between countries, between siblings, and not between them. We are invited to join opposition within the Congress (taken from the middle class) through the national schools, when in reality we need to train cadres in the poor class and the poor class, in other words we need to build within the class trabajadora.Ahora well, stupidity of these constitutional illusions of nationalism are too obvious to be worth refuting particular. The limited theoretical soundness of their leader is to leave us abruptly induced by these misconceptions, "You have to unravel the first steps to do the ridiculous situation of obtuse Philistine, who would lament the second, although he himself has helped to give First " [5] . But let us record their statements so they can be support to the above: the petty bourgeois drunkenness. "It would be perhaps the political burial of what is left, if that does not assume an attitude of unity with nationalism and other forces ... This is a challenge of Popular Forces. " Wrong definition of what the "Aristocracy Supporter" [6] is who has often led to the slaughter of Popular Forces party interests to safeguard. Supporter aristocracy, or left opposition, who say Ollanta have not had good results and we have to reappraise it as such - "opposition" - there, as opposed to his party is well organized and there is consistency in their leaders, as as stated in the paper already quoted, "You can see that there are plenty of cars, I do not know who they are, but they are inside. "Reflection: Do not disobey the story and less of a" I BELIEVE "that has no idea what it means organization and theoretical and practical coherence" within a party. Bibliography:
[1] Victor Villanueva, "Militarism in Peru," Company Graphic T Scheuch, Lima 1962 (book were extracted from historical references)
[2] Luis Alberto Sánchez, "Haya de la Torre and APRA," Editorial in the Pacific, Stgo. In Chile, 1955, p. 334
[3] The article kicks off this criticism in the newspaper Our Flag whose link is: http://nuestra-bandera.com/ Article.php? id_articulo = 13
[4] International Bolshevik Tendency "Critical reflections and alternatives around the National Project Document"
[5] Lenin, "The two revolutions (Articles and Speeches, 1917), Progress Publishers, Moscow - USSR, 1974
[6] very well-defined concept in the book of Marcial Rubio Correa, "Political Parties Act, the rules that no one would pass." Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, May 1997.
Chereque Pretel Setting
Vice-Chairman of Justice of the Civic Association for the Concerns of the region La Libertad. Urb
Sánchez Carrión, Quito Passage # 174, Trujillo, Peru
Phone: 044-9264506
Phone: 044-475107
0 comments:
Post a Comment