13/03/2007 1:01
am The struggle for dominance of mankind, through the 2 systems world, one Communist and the other capitalist, has come to an end with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1991. The years 1990-91 date the crisis of perestroika. The failure of economic reform and the rise of nationalism weakened Gorbachev's draft, and threatening the cohesion of the USSR. The revolution of Orthodox (August 1991) tried to stop the process, but, failing, sparked the democratic revolution, causing the end of communism and the collapse of the USSR.
This indicates that since we are all governed under the guidelines of political and economic free enterprise capitalism. Where 25 years, given political maturity and homogeneity In order to improve the quality of life, sustainable activities that guarantee the welfare of the population. Ie "there are no major discrepancies, capitalism is the key to increasing the country's development." Its leaders are individuals whose economic power, "is guaranteed to make your business practice a national political project with little chance of being wrong", it acts with "Social Responsibility."
In Latin American countries, however, something strange happens to logic. "The people reject the development, does not want more jobs and fight poverty and an oppressive government statist" (see here, in videos, "struggles uneducated people without reasons) . This political struggle in Latin America is going to lead to disaster for the economy because "a government without international loans without TNCs can not create jobs, causing a destabilization in the economy." As the origin of this error, the disorienting effect of the media, which funded a pressure group seeking to create "a false image of the system, carried away by this Sector Resentful, and thus leading to the masses mobilized by feelings and not rationality. "Thus is woven a hoax in all developed countries against those who enjoy the benefits of capitalism, right, artificial within the same officer in Latin America and the great imperialist powers.
If we consider these arguments as a basis, we understand that there are class contradictions: They occur not only with the powers, as in the demonstrations against Bush in America but also within the limes of the same borders against the lackeys, and neo conservative bourgeoisie . Sector working class against the imperialist bourgeoisie and pro-imperialist, contradictions ripe for objective and subjective conditions, occurred by bourgeois economic vision that fails to explain the origin of the crisis and its cyclical nature. Not for lack of intelligence but because their perspective is not perceived class la naturaleza explotadora del sistema productivo. Su perspectiva de clase no percibe las leyes que originan y causan el desarrollo de las crisis, puesto que parte de la superioridad e inmortalidad del sistema capitalista. Por ello se mantiene en un análisis superficial y erróneo encaminado a evitar que las masas ataquen al sistema económico. Encubriendo así, la clara lucha de clases que parten del Capitalismo Salvaje.
Esta lucha coherente con el sentido histórico y biológico, en lo cual todo lo que nace tiene que morir, determina nuevamente una pugna ideológica entre los políticos de izquierda y de derecha. Este suceso lógico, conduce a un nuevo y quejumbroso argumento en los defensores del Sistema: "Hacen del Sistema inconsistent because they fail to consequential arrangements. Time is lost because "we discuss the system" and no longer tries to produce more welfare and development " [1] . Basically what you want to maintain the status quo, stop their course, ignoring the course of history to cling to power. The inability of the electorate is also another factor that maintains the right, as a result of these confusions that give rise to social unrest "discouraged" because, as already stated, they are drawn by their poor knowledge and political immaturity, which of course will end in the disagreement with the management of the rulers. This dissatisfaction with the party or the chairman of the moment, is what makes turn his vision for "False representatives of their class" arrive "by promising" and being "charismatic." What is not said that failure is originating from the same development driven by the pro-capitalist government, which allows corporations, create clubs, bars and brothels to keep dormant the proletarian masses in their pleasures, far from his consciousness and social problems, to ensure stability and investor. In this sense, the ideological struggle to win you must destroy the elitism in the necessary training for managers, planners and economists, to return to class the opportunity to be the manager of its revolution, as you know things are bad for the inability of the State Government removed from popular control. This new capability and awareness will be able to take control of the state, plan, work and succeed with independence, democracy and a system of socialization of the means of production. Root cutting the margin to a technocratic rise to power of those who always wanted to study to grow and not to serve. Consequently, it has the power class and not the Empire, and although it continues to conceal the reality beneath sublime words - Social Responsibility - the final victory will give the working class with a general insurrection. For if the "ideology" capitalist seeking development through economic theory in practice is totally disassociated from the real economy and the economy even more popular. Then understand that the winning system (Capitalism Wild), does not work for developing nations, and must die in honor of the Dialectic.
[1] Leon Cohen Eskenazi "Reach for All", p. 46, October 1989, Lima - Peru
University Movement "New Generation Student"for true social revolution
Marco Pretzel Chereque
0 comments:
Post a Comment